Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 218 ]

Total 218 documents matching your query.

201. RE: LF: Antenna Current (score: 1)
Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 14:43:54 +0100
input then Ah. This is one of the great mysteries of loading coils that has always baffled me. Does anyone have a good explanation? Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT) Are we in a Monty Python farce here ? Are you
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-05/msg00237.html (14,371 bytes)

202. LF: LF Forum details (score: 1)
Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 11:34:25 +0100
The LF Forum scheduled for Sunday 20th May will be held at the headquarters of the Flight Refuelling Amateur Radio Society at Merley near Wimborne Dorset. Start time is scheduled for 1100. Directions
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-05/msg00242.html (13,371 bytes)

203. RE: LF: Off-topic: For non-UK readers (score: 1)
Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 08:42:26 +0100
Many years ago I had to give a presentation on a student project and used the term 'cheap' to explain my choice of components. The instructor immediately pulled me up and insisted the correct express
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-05/msg00291.html (10,886 bytes)

204. LF: RE: <Tech> Re: more Wolf tests (score: 1)
Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 16:26:23 +0100
re Jim's comments : I have been thinking along similar lines for somewhat different reasons. I don't claim to have expertise in this field, but suppose the data rate of Wolf was reduced by a factor o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-05/msg00321.html (12,741 bytes)

205. LF: RE: Wolf Tests (score: 1)
Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 09:54:56 +0100
A recent discussion with G3PLX made something click in my mind about the widespread adoption of Wolf for LF communications, and is it really the right way to go ? A heavily coded relatively wideband
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-05/msg00326.html (12,255 bytes)

206. LF: RE: 3 phase ripple (score: 1)
Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:15:10 +0100
John et al - Consulted the reference you gave (page 14-4 in the 6th edition) and can see where the figure comes from. The value of 4.2% quoted is, as you said, the RMS value of the ripple / mean outp
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00055.html (11,979 bytes)

207. LF: RE: 3 phase ripple (score: 1)
Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 08:27:24 +0100
Think I'm going to spend some time looking at rectified 3 phase waveforms - can't just accept a something until I know exactly why and can derive it from first principles. : The engineering mentality
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00057.html (9,403 bytes)

208. LF: RE: LX1PD (score: 1)
Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:03:45 +0100
That's set me thinking evil thoughts ....... 600V Mosfets in bridge. 3 phase rectifier giving 13% ripple even without any decoupling caps, at a ripple freq of 300Hz. 10kW perhaps ! Andy G4JNT voltage
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00065.html (8,329 bytes)

209. RE: LF: Re: Static effects (score: 1)
Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:43:58 +0100
But much better still a bleed choke, making sure the inductance is high enough not to affect the matching. A good choke would be made from a ferrite core and as it is not carrying any power a smaller
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00111.html (10,273 bytes)

210. LF: RE: SWR Bridge Diode Failures (score: 1)
Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:26:56 +0100
Wouldn't you be better off feeding a bleed resistor as well, to stop the static building up in the first place ? Or better still, a choke to make sure there is a proper DC path. Andy G4JNT I have now
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00129.html (8,790 bytes)

211. LF: RE: Anyone using a magnetic loop for 13 6 Khz? (score: 1)
Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 16:19:16 +0100
Another example of a reply without the original posting being returned, what is going on ? Anyway ... I'll send the spreadsheet direct. Turns were spaced about 50mm apart - defined by the standard pi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00138.html (13,739 bytes)

212. LF: RE: Anyone using a magnetic loop for 136 Khz? (score: 1)
Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 14:11:41 +0100
I initially used one on 73kHz. Two turns of 10mm diameter water pipe, overall loop dia 3m. Efficiency was about -50dB compared with -40dB for a modest 7m high T antenna so the loop went in the bin. H
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00142.html (11,297 bytes)

213. LF: Magnetometer uses (score: 1)
Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:54:15 +0100
I have been given a small compass module that, apart from magnetic heading, gives a serial digital high resolution output of X and Y components of the Earths magnetic field. Added a simple PIC + S/W
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00149.html (9,603 bytes)

214. LF: RE: Tx driver chips (score: 1)
Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:43:43 +0100
Instead of trying to control nanosecond long crossover problems and skew in driver chip propagation times, why not employ the Decca Tx approach of a small value (damped) inductor between the top and
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00187.html (9,512 bytes)

215. RE: LF: RE: 73kHz tests tonight (score: 1)
Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:43:43 +0100
One option would be to use the TC4428 driver chip. This has one inverting and one non inverting driver. Drive both inputs in parallel and connect the FET driver transformer primary, now with twice as
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00192.html (9,898 bytes)

216. LF: RE: 73kHz tests tonight (score: 1)
Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:32:00 +0100
What sort of Tx is it ? Andy 'JNT Dear LF Group, I got my new 73kHz TX running with suprisingly few problems (so far...), so will try running a beacon signal tonight on 71.924kHz, 30s dot QRSS, start
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00198.html (9,852 bytes)

217. LF: RE: Re. 73KHz T/A (score: 1)
Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 13:28:48 +0100
Could this path be enhanced by the Earth / Ionosphere waveguide propagation mode, prevalent at lower frequencies. I know it is rather too high frequency to be normally considered for this mode, but w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00256.html (8,777 bytes)

218. RE: LF: QRP (score: 1)
Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 12:42:06 +0100
About this time last year I seem to remember sending some narrow bandwidth SMT Hell sigs at powers of a Watt or so. With the QRP discussion going on recently, is anyone interested if I set up this be
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00259.html (8,718 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu