To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re2: LF: Another weak sig |
From: | [email protected] |
Date: | Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:09:12 EDT |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
sorry, that should have been 18:04...18:11. - Markus [email protected]: In the overlayed image I can vaguely see a few brighter noise pixels during Laurie's "Q" at 19:04...19:11, which would have been inconspicuous in the Argo capture alone. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Another weak sig, MarkusVester |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Another weak sig, Vernall |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Nil to report, Vernall |
Next by Thread: | LF: Ropex "The First", PA0WFO |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |