To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: 500kHz 1mW WSPR beaconing |
From: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:42:13 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lkEKG/n6z5XgDe648LNZKdfk6tge6tQkwwUeJXv+IRM=; b=lPH4BU/ITGC3D6IC3EiJ3tg8CRYQuE0LgF1a2pOI2DHXQz6gcRlTtyGy4OpV7HAgvi 2szWRJ9Rv9TZvPNIg1g1YZ5+VYYT/W5C+z9tsIvFj8RIED01lqsMcTz6yVE965oAkg0q uf28G6rGpsa6w/kC6iBt5boXwabUU9rJVfTwo= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=RzdOn0sunSB16MunqM/txRMgHzauM79ogYsGdgPGBRMo/fAGpFQ2pTNjzBqfVKwhso ltwxSfVFNWQ/yavrG+SXoGWPv4FamN3nMHkdMDV8EHtvPEV1q0PnBLjX2hG9CKIZPnyK dcP8KM89y2EoLe7K1gz7TQFKhZHdVD0X0r5Zg= |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <14E9228C113E44A6A66C5DEF8A144F28@AGB> |
References: | <[email protected]> <14E9228C113E44A6A66C5DEF8A144F28@AGB> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
---
There is no 'chance' involved. The strong source coding employed in all the WSJT modes to get the number of bits to be encoded down to an absolute minimum, before proper error correction is added, removes all wasted redundancy in the original callsign format. This has the result that most truly random bit patterns will therefore generate a valid looking callsign. Its an artefact of efficient coding.
That this only happens occasionally is due to the strong properly constructed error correction that is subsequently added.
BUT As the callsign is not encoded in the most efficient way it could possibly be (which would be a codebook of all the radio-ams in the world = 1 million perhaps with a 20 bit reference number) we identify an invalid callsign by experience, and by correlating with known propagation / locator facts.
Information theory is a wonderful study - and being able to be put into practice more easily with cheap processing power than it ever was before. I'll be covering this, amongst other aspects of weak signalling, at the Martlesham Microwave Roundtable. http://mmrt.homedns.org/start.html (talk entitled 6dB better than CW.)
2009/10/24 Graham <[email protected]>
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: WSPR, Richard Newstead |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: OE5ODL F4DTL, F4DTL |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: 500kHz 1mW WSPR beaconing, Graham |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: 500kHz 1mW WSPR beaconing, Richard Newstead |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |