Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: wspr

from [Andy Talbot] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: wspr
From: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:11:21 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=cDx0jaGTAcFwM+TiMjXWMq9z49kOLQo59ervG5KMPFA=; b=x4NcEK6i81GRfpjiX11IV5MX6wFwVAnhWIv6u4/ORMg95f83fgsvYWRml/jwJ6pUZY vT/TIGONNoIiDHJXcoXdAr9PLCOKIpP4NfMbjueLt8IHPZd5ObKLTygR7eHnb34kj7cg hD4IuD3UYX8Ccww2rDahuZ+p6UZmFNp2jsJ6A=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=EgxDCY1g5XMmS81c8tpuuun038Y2A45sOXfPNmc+gVa0kq0tIQLTwSXjmV8Oxt9All w5nXjQiKji0MOB1B88uDtJjLjrDGkXNCRhSKb/f4YIyLPYGRygeD7fsKOCm+BUcQEyaQ X0tcv6j5uBvQSvUhxEySEPU8imx7x0cUFe/68=
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <67701E323AA1429FB5B51ACDAA26DFF8@AGB>
References: <005601ca2b2f$f97ee260$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <[email protected]> <008601ca2b38$eaff8e20$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <[email protected]> <67701E323AA1429FB5B51ACDAA26DFF8@AGB>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
What has that got to do with LF ?

Andy
www.g4jnt.com

this email has been scanned for political correctness by the nanny state


2009/9/2 Graham <[email protected]>
You just could not make it up !

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqsT4xnKZPg

G .

--------------------------------------------------
From: "John RABSON" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 9:47 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: wspr


On 01/09/2009 at 20:17 mal hamilton wrote:

Roger I am stating the facts, someone else mentioned seeing the signals
on the waterfall but they were not decoding. I could easlily have made a
qso on cw given the strength of signals whereas WSPR was not decoding, so
the exercise is pointless.

That was me.  I wasn't decoding because I don't yet have a decoder.  Had I had one, and given the snr I observed, I would have expected 100% copy. On the few occasions I have heard Mal, his snr has not been anything like as good as WSPR.

John F5VLF








No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.75/2341 - Release Date: 09/02/09 05:50:00





[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: wspr, Graham
Next by Date:  Re: LF: wspr, Graham
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: wspr, Graham
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: wspr, Graham
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]