To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: RE: LF: 8270Hz |
From: | [email protected] |
Date: | Sat, 04 Jan 2014 12:36:57 +0100 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=pass [email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kabelmail.de; s=mail; t=1388835418; bh=rQ7ALFX0izC525E0DIWV9iTVc6UM/hG2dHZyR47dE80=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=ODVEANow8gTFacojVe+IAZOSAx6+uEtKtTu0B4CQdfbKbAAU8p2NWvULjcc5Exn2m 2JkV0iWY9gqNWtE8ygiVZc1cS6RLqVqnimX101k0jsF9GNJKRWX3q30HnSmn8hkAJo wJFF4Qg2h3lRI0aftfleQlua56ozk51mPxdPn/mo= |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Lubos es all,
nice you shifted your grabber. yesterday at 1618UTC I switched the TX off and now at 1227UTC the carrier is on the air agn. will Paul Nichelson shift his grabber too? OK. Peter, some hours later Ill switch to Op.4H. GL Uwe/dj8wx Von: [email protected] Gesendet: 04.01.2014 10:11 An: [email protected] Betreff: RE: LF: 8270Hz Hello Uwe!
I saw your signal on 8270Hz yesterday afternoon. Are you transmitting now, please? There is a visible signal on 8269.93 on PA1SDB´s grabber, but it is out of my grabber window (8270 +/- 50mH). Is it your signal or some QRM?
73!
Lubos, OK2BVG
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 14:30:43 +0100 From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: LF: 8270Hz OK.. OK. dreamers, the TX is on the air since 1309UTC.
QRG: 8270.000Hz. WX: continuous rain but not so strong. when ever the order comes, I can switch to Op-4H. GL Uwe/dj8wx Von: [email protected] Gesendet: 03.01.2014 13:21 An: [email protected] Kopie: [email protected] Betreff: Fw: VLF: 8.275 kHz Paul Nicholson put forth the important argument
that we'd better stay away from 8280 because it's a multiple of 60
Hz. Mains harmonics tend to drift a bit with the line frequeny so further
away is better.
Thus I retract my preposition, and suggest instead
to stay with the original 8270 Hz.
Uwe, go ahead!
Best 73,
Markus
PS Direct harmonics from 16.67 Hz are relatively
weak here, even though the railway is only 400 m away. It looks
more like carriers from switchmode power conversion units
(eg near 8 kHz), accompanied by the telltale 33 Hz spaced sidebands.
Unfortunately these frequencies are not easily predictable.
8970 is well placed with respect to harmonics of both 50 and 60Hz. 8270/8275 not so good in a 60Hz region. 8124 to 8126 would be a good range, considering harmonics of 16.67Hz, 50Hz, and 60Hz. Let me know what is decided, I will switch my spectrogram over to the new band. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: OPds 4H 8270 RX QRV PA1SDB, PA1SDB, Peter |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: WD2XNS OP32 / OPDS32, jrusgrove |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: 8270Hz, PA1SDB, Peter |
Next by Thread: | RE: LF: 8270Hz, Lubos |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |