Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Jason recording session

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Jason recording session
From: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 18:49:43 EDT
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: <[email protected]>
Hi Wolf, Jim, Stewart and LF group,

mni tnx (also to Alberto!) for the enjoyable QSO and Jason tests. As I hadn't read about the sched on this reflector before, I sort of stumbled in when I heard Jim asking for lower power Jason.

Markus used his linear TX with an output power between 130 W down to 100 mW.

The first two steps of the power reduction were done in an improvised manner by loosening the inductive coupling to the antenna variometer, which presents a higher load impedance to the PA and preserves its efficiency. In the beginning, I had some trouble with my automatic antenna tuner: Apparently, the sharper antenna resonance produced more gain in the phase detector servo loop, resulting in oscillation of the variometer and calling for a (literally) hands-on solution. Stewart may possibly detect some low-level 3 Hz sidebands... The even lower powers were generated by additionally modifying the PA's duty cycle, aided by a scope coupled to the antenna for relative amplitude calibration. The step from 1 W to 0.1 W was in the middle of the last Jason transmission.

I don't know what Markus' lowest ERP was when Jim had still fair copy - he may explain himself.

The efficiency of the antenna is about 8*10^-4, so 1 W results in 0.8mW EMRP or 1.5 mW EDRP.

it seems my old laptop is not suitable for this - Windoze asked me to
close
the application which occupied the soundcard, and a second PC was not available during the test.

...same here. Without AC97, I guess we have to resort to a-posteriori decoding.
Thanks for the test to everyone involved. Jim told us he will be putting
out
a Jason signal tomorrow, maybe something to listen for across the pond if
he
 uses full power ?

Perhaps with a lot of luck, as condx seem a little unfavorable presently. Had a spectrogram running last night and most of today, to evaluate what looks like CFH's idle carrier on 137029. Nighttime levels were consistent at a very moderate level around 4 dBuV/m (compared to good nights peaking in the 30 to 40 dBuV/m range), but then on the other hand it was visible all day, down at -15...-10 dBuV/m.

Best 73 Markus, DF6NM


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>