To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: 500m drums of coax? |
From: | [email protected] |
Date: | Sat, 2 Aug 2003 06:43:44 EDT |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
>Are you making a coax dipole for 136? I've always wondered about dipoles / loops at 136k? A 'dipole' just lying on rocky ground where the water table is many metres below the surface could be quite effective. The angle of radiation would be poor but the efficiency may not be as bad as first suppossed. One advantage of a big antenna on the ground is that it can't fall down and, for the local planning committe, it's less than 9 feet high. Some time ago I tried to simulate this by making a dipole for 21MHz and had a number of QSOs through it while gradually lowering it's height and retrimming as I went. I managed to work Romania were I sent "Ant dipole 5cm agl". I have no idea what the Romanian though of this madness and he didn't stay around long to find out. Incidentally, at about 2 inches off the ground the antenna was resonant at about 20% less than it's normal 'free space length'. Never did find a big field to try it on 136k. 73 David G0MRF |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Acty on 27.th/28th Sept. 2003 QRSS-Bandwidth, Hans-Albrecht Haffa |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: 500m drums of coax dipole, captbrian |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Acty on 27.th/28th Sept. 2003 QRSS-Bandwidth, Hans-Albrecht Haffa |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Low dipole, Mike Dennison |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |