To: | "John Andrews" <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: 183 kHz BC Q5 in NC at sunset! |
From: | "Joe Craig" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:10:54 -0330 (NST) |
Cc: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <006901c3d641$b90d70f0$1f00a8c0@dellboy> <[email protected]> <000d01c3d689$77e9a3d0$1f00a8c0@dellboy> <[email protected]> <002101c3d6ad$d7079330$1f00a8c0@dellboy> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
John, What do you think are the odds of CW between here and Holden (about 1000 miles)? I've been toying with the idea a bit. Joe VO1NA On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, John Andrews wrote: Dave, > Given that one of the big guns would probably have 15dB advantage on that > signal it might be worth monitoring reception until a peak is seen then > trying a CW call? Means staying up all night though! CW would have been very ambitious under those conditions. QRSS3 or 10 might have gotten the call sign through. My 3-second screen at that frequency is a horrid mess of Loran lines and local interference, however. The slow speed stuff has made the hobby possible in a location hardly suited for LF work. Others more out in the country might do better. John Andrews, W1TAG |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: 183 kHz BC Q5 in NC at sunset!, John Andrews |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: 183 kHz BC Q5 in NC at sunset!, Dexter McIntyre W4DEX |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: 183 kHz BC Q5 in NC at sunset!, John Andrews |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: 183 kHz BC Q5 in NC at sunset!, LAWRENCE MAYHEAD |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |