To: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Spectrum Lab & VLF |
From: | jcraig@mun.ca |
Date: | Sun, 24 May 2015 10:31:29 -0230 (NDT) |
In-reply-to: | <8D2639CB5174D36-131C-D898@webmail-vm180.sysops.aol.com> |
References: | <AC666FAFFAF340258B396B3B6D0949A6@AGB> <8D2639CB5174D36-131C-D898@webmail-vm180.sysops.aol.com> |
Reply-to: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
Sender: | owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
Dear Group, A QRSS60 detection at 5.2 km is the best DX for yours truly to date. Although there was a detection at 7 km, this was probably via conduction from a nearby mains line. The RX is a DK7FC VLF probe and Spec Lab on a laptop. The next logical step is to try QRSS120 to get past the 5.78 km boundary.To my abject dismay, when doing: Quick Settings/ Slow Morse Reception(QRSS)/ Slow CW, 120 s/dot/ Enter AUDIO centre frequency (8277 entered) / OK/no; the spectrum screen scrolls across completely blank and the real time spectrum on the right shows a flat line. Going back to QRSS60, all is just fine. Am I or the computer malfunctioning again? Many thanks Joe VO1NA |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: False Decode or Real? - Opera vs opds, Steinar Aanesland |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Interesting 630M WSPR night, John Andrews |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: False Decode or Real? - Opera vs opds, Markus Vester |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Spectrum Lab & VLF, edgar |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |