Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna
From: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 22:38:41 -0230 (NDT)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <003a01cd8e17$f3e02f00$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

Thank-you Wolf.

Unfortunately only QRN has been heard on 472.5 so far.

73
Joe

On Sun, 9 Sep 2012, wolf_dl4yhf wrote:

Hello Joe,
rrr - but their RX frequency is 3544 kHz now.

73,
 Wolf .

Am 09.09.2012 01:32, schrieb [email protected]:
Hi Jay, Group.

RX is now on 472.5 kHz and TX QRV on 1825. Lets hope they resume operations.

73
Joe

On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, [email protected] wrote:

Does anyone know if they will be operating during the overnight period?

Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  WE2XGR/2


----- Original Message ----- From: "wolf_dl4yhf" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2012 6:58 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: DK0SWF antenna


John,

you wrote:

>
Calling CQ ad infinitum, while also 60Hz higher I also copy DF0WD calling CQ too. I assume neither station can hear each other?
<

Of course I could hear DK0SWF calling CQ about 100 Hz away. But I had given up, finally, after trying for the umpteenth time to get a response from them. As Mal and others already noted, their signal was incredibly strong, but they must have had a very, very serious problem with their receiver. Maybe they should have asked the SWF (Südwestfunk) to close down some of the transmitters in their vincinity ? Oh well. Hope the pilots in Poland were not too irritated by the powerful signal, which even beat DK7FC's signal by far !

Despite all the trouble, I was positively surprised to make a QSO with OM1II, whom I heard earlier on, but didn't want to add to the confusion on the semi-official "calling frequency" (472.5 kHz). Also thanks to G3KEV, DK8KW, DJ2LF, and DF5QF for the nice QSOs. OZ7FOC was partly audible, but difficult tonight.

73,
  Wolf  DL4YHF / DF0WD



While I applaud any new MF activity, I wonder why, if DK0SWF are unable to receive efficiently on their antenna, they call CQ?

Surely if this is a "one time" opportunity to transmit from "SWF" and reception is impossible they could do something else with the time on the air. A WSPR transmission for the same length of time would gather much more usefuly information than calling CQ with no hope of hearing any replies?

John
GM4SLV
IP90gg
Shetland Isles









This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at
http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php





This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at
http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>