Dear LF Group,
I confess -- this was my error. The FSK is controlled by a RIT pot
on a Canadian Marconi RX, selected for its nice stable OXCO. After
calling CQ on DFCW10, a beacon on DFCW60 was tried, but the FSK was not
set back to 0.2Hz. My apologies for any confusion caused by this
operator incompetence!
On another note, wet nylon makes a poor halyard on a live tower.
Sunday, the 100m wire was found lying on the treetops.
Normally this is caused by ice and wind, breaking the wire.
This time the nylon halyard, rated at 300 kg breaking strength,
had melted and broke. The Decca had been feeding the tower
the night before.
73
Joe
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Stefan Schäfer wrote:
I think Joe was testing DFCW-10 where 0.5 Hz is a usual shift frequency. The
signal can be seen in the QRSS-10 windows of TF3HZ and DK7FC for example.
73, Stefan
Am 13.12.2011 16:31, schrieb Jean-Pierre Méré:
Hi Markus ,
Thank you for this attempt of explanation . I think that it is about
another station .
Because Joe (NA)cannot be on two frequencies to the same moment
(to see capture)
73 Jean-Pierre f1afj
Le 13/12/2011 15:19, Markus Vester a écrit :
Jean Pierre,
the 137776.4 Hz signal should be the dot frequency of VO1NA's
ultrawideband DFCW ;-) At the top, there could possibly be a trace from
XNS on 137781.
Best 73,
MArkus
-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Jean-Pierre Méré <[email protected]>
An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]>
Verschickt: Di, 13 Dez 2011 10:52 am
Betreff: LF: T/A: XKO , VO1NA & ???????
Hi Dex and Joe ,
Verry good copy of WD2XKO at 03:00utc ( see on capture )
Unident on 137 776.3 ~
73 jean-Pierre f1afj
This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at
http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2011.php
|
