Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: Loops v Verticals

from [Eric KD5UWL] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Loops v Verticals
From: Eric KD5UWL <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:46:23 -0500 (CDT)
In-reply-to: <002f01c46df8$a3fcfec0$72cdfc3e@l8p8y6>
References: <002f01c46df8$a3fcfec0$72cdfc3e@l8p8y6>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected] 


On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, hamilton mal wrote:


For those that do not know. Research around Europe has shown that VERTICALS are 
the only antennas suitable for Transmitting on LF. Loops are fine for 
Receiving, little or large but the bigger the better. Who has ever heard of a 
LF broadcasting station using loops for TX.
73 de G3KEV


Who asked?  Who cares?
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  RE: LF: Loops v Verticals, Michael J Underhill
Next by Date:  LF: Re: Re: Re: Loops v Verticals, John Andrews
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: Loops v Verticals, Alexander S. Yurkov
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: Loops v Verticals, riese-k3djc
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]