To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: LF: Ground loss |
From: | "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 14 May 2002 18:49:49 +0000 (GMT) |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Hi, John. On Tue, 14 May 2002, john sexton wrote: Are you sure that you have written the formula correctly?Omega (2 Pi f) appears in "a" in the numerator and in "Xc" in the denominator and therefore cancels out, making the formula frequency independent! Yes, it's so. I know that R is frequency depedent realy. May be this is low frequency limit formula when frequencyvariation disappears. May be next more advanced formula will yeld such a behavior. Any way someone is better than nothing... 73 de RA9MB/Alex http://www.qsl.net/ra9mb |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: RE: USA/136, John W Gould |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: LF: Ground loss, Alexander S. Yurkov |
Previous by Thread: | RE: LF: Ground loss, john sexton |
Next by Thread: | RE: LF: Ground loss, Rik Strobbe |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |