Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

RE: LF: RE: 137.5kHz WSPR tonight

from [Dave G3WCB.] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: LF: RE: 137.5kHz WSPR tonight
From: "Dave G3WCB." <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 20:17:19 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=s1024; t=1306351041; bh=8HajZQonJ9U6WjNkkorVrtFaUv3JV3mJg2jf+Zf5W1U=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:In-Reply-To:Importance; b=5nb4ZXc/I4OIav4kvREA/meWuUcGnV/WTUruA+ONzdM8GUVvHV97zu3fLKUvdNxCiFPHwnOatuCtMsQc0doSb9bWN5AtKMBpTfZBgTJYotNvW3DapoNUb6A2OV+nPmPvaHQy4fD4DFtai4gJYMykT4vXtippsGe0zHZwcrF+kEA=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:In-Reply-To:Importance; b=DfO7GcmPA0Bp+BtMQ1lpJZDE/qn93dE4WzOBC73SRqqUUZOg6yos+pYdfVHf0I8iqLq1147KG0HTzu7jBB1J9PQW1t4qYq+9nbhZF2K86LhgyPGU6ukimoMjbfqQN5VrW+2qFF+vHyJn2wrCX3DmeFLnUy2eOGpHV8yIoYPK/fs= ;
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Don't think so, Roger.
 
On past experience, you'd need to be about 6dB stronger to get a decode on 137khz with my RX set up here. The strong in-band carriers seem to cause decoding problems,
 
I'll leave it running overnight to see if condx perk up.
 
73, Dave G3WCB IO91RM
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Roger Lapthorn
Sent: 25 May 2011 20:00
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: RE: 137.5kHz WSPR tonight

Yes Dave, all these times correspond. Do you think there is any hope of a decode?

73s
Roger XBM

On 25 May 2011 19:52, Dave G3WCB. <[email protected]> wrote:
Roger,
 
I saw WSPR-like signals on 137,535 at 18h24, 18h34 and 18h46. They were too weak to decode. Do they coincide with your transmission times?
 
73, Dave G3WCB IO91RM
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Roger Lapthorn
Sent: 25 May 2011 19:07
To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: 137.5kHz WSPR tonight

My 100uW ERP WSPR station is on again this evening until around 2300z looking to receive, and give, reports.

73s
Roger G3XBM

--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/




--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/

Attachment: XBM_1900z 25 May 2011.jpg
Description: JPEG image

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: RE: 137.5kHz WSPR tonight, Roger Lapthorn
Next by Date:  Re: LF: RE: 137.5kHz WSPR tonight, Roger Lapthorn
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: RE: 137.5kHz WSPR tonight, Roger Lapthorn
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: RE: 137.5kHz WSPR tonight, Roger Lapthorn
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]