LF: 137 kHz WSPR tests saturday morning DF0WD & M0BMU

["Dave G3WCB" <ganymede444@btopenworld.com>]

Jim, Wolf, LF,

 

Reception as follows:-

                      
093600   7  10  1.1   -10  0  M0BMU IO91 27        
094200   3 -21  1.5     1  0  DF0WD JO42 27        
094400   7   8  1.2   -10  0  M0BMU IO91 27        

73, Dave G3WCB IO91RM

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of Scholz, Marco
Sent: 17 January 2009 09:32
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: RE: 137 kHz WSPR tests saturday morning

Good morning,

good reception of DF0WD

092600  18 -11  0.9    11  0  DF0WD JO42 27        
092800   9 -20  0.6     0  0  M0BMU IO91 27

 

vy73

Marco

DD7PC in JN49ax

---

From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of dl4yhf@freenet.de
Sent: 17 January 2009 10:24
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: 137 kHz WSPR tests saturday morning

Greetings WSPR spotters and everyone,

Many thanks for the WSPR activity.

To me, it was a nice way to compare two receiving sites.
The first attempt to receive Jim at DF0WD showed:

0900  -7  0.5   0.137500  0 M0BMU IO91 27

(automatic uploading of spots to http://www.wsprnet.org/meptspots.php?mode=html&band=2190&limit=50&findcall=&findreporter=&sort=date

was off then, and Jim seems to have gone QRT by now.

At the same period, the SNR received at home (indoor loop) was -20 dB ... 13 dB less SNR than here at the club station, using the 200 meter wire antenna. What a difference !
I don't know exactly what the ERP is here at the moment (ground is frozen still), but comparing Jim's report to the MEPT database, it seems to be in the same region as M0BMU.

Will keep sending at 25 % TX for a short while now.

73,
  Wolf  DL4YHF ( @ df0wd,  JO42FD) .

--