Re: LF: MF 630m: False Decode or Real?

["Graham" <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>]

Latest RadCom (June 2015)  Page 70

 

 

''If this  compression is used , any noise that  gets  past the  decoder will  generate  a random call sign that looks 

as if it could be  valid  . This is  seen in the  WSPR  system occasionally, such decodes are rare but they do  happen'' 

 

Meanwhile back at  tranquillity  base .......

 

24  Hours  wspr  LF

 

Seems to  of  been  a RARE   24  hours of  RARE  dx  prefixes   M'Lud  ?

 

 

24 Hours  Opera 136  with both data and dynamic ,

nothing  except  wholesome gluten free  decodes  and detections

 

 

A compelling   closing    argument   M'Lud  ?

 

 

73- Graham

G0NBD

 

Opera  the  right  smart pants  mode 

 

 

 

From: Andy Talbot

Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 7:16 PM

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Subject: Re: LF: MF 630m: False Decode or Real?

Latest RadCom (June 2015)  Page 70

I rest my case,  M'lud :-)

Andy G4JNT

On 20 May 2015 at 19:02, Jochen Althoff <althoff@gmx.com> wrote:

Just popped up at my RX:

17:52    477 VK3ELV de DF1VB/3 Op8 Deep Search ?? 16348 km -37 dB in Dortmund with 140w + Top loaded L 18m vert 80m horz

Any comments welcome

73, Jochen



--
 -= DF1VB =-
 -= KH2MM =-
Jochen Althoff
+49 171 2020206

"The wireless telegraph is not difficult to understand.
The ordinary telegraph is like a very long cat.
You pull the tail in New York, and it meows in Los Angeles.
The wireless is the same, only without the cat."
(Albert Einstein)