Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: LF/MF ACTY

from [Roger Lapthorn] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: LF/MF ACTY
From: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:00:39 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:references:from :content-type:x-mailer:in-reply-to:message-id:date:to :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=29z1st7yTU97bqsuViLdPUVpoEl0iHyPnyalMKplyeQ=; b=qo8hLsrpM88TxtYzltH2MH050isjbKB8AopmWbVhu/VEQqQ8LEz78pdKWpCu7h3Az1 5GIv9LlN2L+d6MUoEGQTaJEHIuMR/yMWkGKJKdVPcTxNHODhkN2EEXoiKgJCpijiiD3y tLwGA6VhtOCWtTBXtMEUZUDJszjwEKGPf7HyU=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:references:from:content-type:x-mailer:in-reply-to :message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; b=tcWRSlxhaWPAvrAqTRD5mRyu2QGXiIr6I+AjogOvM1rJOR+j7+abbREPRqtzRUXMiC K8jzDCTUOVWcd8vhzdpntXCB+6FbdU5IzctKCBz+3oUTw2eXJyWOrGkvre1Qn3mpjHyD MXKB8OIeY0y4EL+RVEeyeoimAmtBNpjCNG+Jk=
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <00c001cb9b05$2718ce70$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
References: <00a801cb9b02$02313410$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> <00c001cb9b05$2718ce70$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
No Mal I would not, but why not email the station owner and ask him kindly to move? This approach is far more likely to be successful than just moaning here. You have to admit that you do not endear yourself to newcomers here.

73s
Roger G3XBM

Sent from my iPod Touch 4g

On 13 Dec 2010, at 20:34, "mal hamilton" <[email protected]> wrote:

OM
Would you like me to put an unattended CW beacon in the middle of your WSPR frequency working area because this is what is happening at this moment on 502.5 the CW QSO freq area by an unattended RTTY BEACON
G3KEV
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 8:23 PM
Subject: Re: LF: LF/MF ACTY

Here we go again......

Sent from my iPod Touch 4g

On 13 Dec 2010, at 20:12, "mal hamilton" <[email protected]> wrote:

In the beginning when one got a transmit licence the first consideration was to communicate with an other radio amateur and get a report.
Now the procedure seems to be put a BEACON on air and request a report via EMAIL, telephone or mobile phone.
Do not study or listen on the band as a SWL would do but just plonk the beacon anywhere and churn out endless repetive bandslip callsign and QTH info and cause the maximum QRM to those engaged in QSO mode. You cannot ask the station to QSY because the Beacons are unattended.
Appliance Operator assistants I presume.
de G3KEV
 
 
 
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  LF: RE: EA4BVZ RTTY, Dave G3WCB.
Next by Date:  LF: Re: Re: Re: VLF Test Transmission - Monday, Ken
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: LF/MF ACTY, mal hamilton
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: LF/MF ACTY, mal hamilton
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]