To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Date format |
From: | "Bob Eldridge " <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 07 Jan 2003 13:50:24 -0500 |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
Isn't the most logical one YYYY/MM/dd ? Does anyone use this format routinely ?Andy G4JNT> This has been the international standard for at least 25 years, intended to avoid the confusion between the U.S. and the rest of the world. I adopted it for everything in the days of Comm 64, as the computer automatically sorted dates as if they were numbers, and hours and minutes could be added as well for logging. The Year 2K mess should have converted everyone! Bob VE7BS |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: 73kHz JASON, Walter Staubach |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Argo V1 build 132, Thomas Giella KN4LF |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: 73kHz JASON, Walter Staubach |
Next by Thread: | LF: 15db drop in HBG today, 2003-01-07-0600, Dexter McIntyre |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |