To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: RE: Re: Re: Ant Questions |
From: | "Steve Thompson" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 21 Oct 2002 16:14:19 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <DDC408CAE72CD511827A0002A5131CD6D9F7E9@exc_wil08> |
References: | <DDC408CAE72CD511827A0002A5131CD6D9F7E9@exc_wil08> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
On Monday 21 October 2002 14:21, you wrote: Is that in comparison with no top loading at all, or purely horizontal top loading?Hi Geri, >>Do not be tempted to droop the ends of any top wires. > >... I challenge that. My umbrella antenna 18m high with 5 pieces of top-load >radials sloping downwards (each about 7 m long) **works fine** It "works fine" to be sure, and it's possible that this is the only physical shape possible for your surroundings, BUT did you verify that there is no loss from drooping the top hat radials Vs not drooping the top hat radials? My experience with many shapes of top hats is that it DOESreduce the radiation measured in the far field. Steve |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: RE: Re: Re: Ant Questions, Ashlock,William |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Virus Hoax., WarmSpgs |
Previous by Thread: | LF: RE: Re: Re: Ant Questions, Ashlock,William |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: RE: Re: Re: Ant Questions, Dave Brown |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |