| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: LOC G3WSC/P |
| From: | "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 14 Apr 2000 11:32:06 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | <[email protected]> |
G3KEV- IO94SH ---------G3WSC/P- IO91XS--------AZ 175, DISTANCE 287.3 Kms G3KEV- IO94SH -------- MM0ALM- IO87UA--------AZ 340, DISTANCE 320.8 KmsMM0ALM is 2db stronger de G3KEV/SCARBOROUGH. So, if both MM0ALM and G3WSC were running 1W ERP, this completely destroys the argument that higher antennas always work better for the same ERP! Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT) http://www.dennison.demon.co.uk/activity.htm |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: DCF39 info please, Rik Strobbe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: DSP Experimentation, Antenna book etc., Talbot Andrew |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: LOC G3WSC/P, g3kev |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: LOC G3WSC/P, Väinö Lehtoranta |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |