Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: Re: Turbine magnets

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Turbine magnets
From: "Hugh_m0wye" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 10:17:55 +0100
References: <000a01cc7942$09fbef90$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <433A1E6B2B1A4FA895223B81346E0F1C@HughLaptop> <172B542DC14B4B1D95F73D09C9759E3A@IBM7FFA209F07C> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
I think the pylons are very much ON topic, remembering how much noise was received on my car radio as I passed underneath the pylons across the A2 at Gravesend in the days when we listened to the medium wave band rather than FM. Fortunately they are often sited in valleys (glens), for visual reasons, but they will still illuminate the ionosphere.
73
Hugh
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Turbine magnets

On 23 Sep 2011, at 10:42CEST, Chris wrote:

Hi all,
Off topic I know, but whatever about magnetic effects, I agree with Mal when it comes to the appearance of these things. They are gradually ruining the best countryside in the UK. Mind you, the national grid pylons are not much better, would have been well worth the extra cost to bury the cables in my opinion.

One of the IET's predecessor institutions reported it would cost 7 to 22 times as much to install a grid link undergroud instead of using pylons.  By all means do it, but remember it will cost.

John F5VLF

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>