Mal,
They are mostly marketed to swls and thus are not protected against
large signals coming from a nearby transmitter!
--
73 Warren K2ORS
WD2XGJ
WD2XSH/23
WE2XEB/2
WE2XGR/1
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:27 AM, mal hamilton <[email protected]> wrote:
> It would appear there are a lot of BLOWN loops. I wonder why ?
> g3kev
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Trask" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 1:14 PM
> Subject: Re: LF: RE: Wellbrook Loop
>
>
>> >
>> > I am looking for a suitable circuit to use with the blown
>> > loops (they are not completely dead but have a serious loss
>> > of sensitivity but disassembly is certain to destroy the
>> > loop amplifier). I suspect it's not so easy to form a 1
>> > metre loop with aluminium tubing so the loops can be
>> > re-used for experiments.
>> >
>> > I was thinking something along these lines:
>> >
>> > http://www.pm.keirle.com/3_radio/hf_loop_ant/hf_loop_ant.htm
>> >
>> > http://www.ik4hdq.net/doc/testi/smlloop.pdf
>> >
>> > http://www.vlf.it/looptheo7/looptheo7.htm
>> >
>> > http://www.vlf.it/lowfloop/lowfloop.htm
>> >
>>
>> You might want to add this to your list of suitable alternatives:
>>
>> http://www.home.earthlink.net/~christrask/Paper009.html
>>
>>
>> Chris Trask
>> N7ZWY / WDX3HLB
>> Senior Member IEEE
>> http://www.home.earthlink.net/~christrask/
>>
>
>
--
73 Warren K2ORS
WD2XGJ
WD2XSH/23
WE2XEB/2
WE2XGR/1
|
