To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: XGJ in TF |
From: | Warren Ziegler <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 4 Dec 2011 19:48:28 -0500 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=zIntkBEnos1CZHebXopwqtRu6ECJKLWzCKbZxnnti3I=; b=xpWfjwIMvOVbB2dvlGJQtk5u0s6QFo429Uz7/Zv3uzi7HfMqLwvNaB6BEvewPlnOPB T4nAjPxImLWui/veZKmRRUtiX0O6tICO4vC14/Wi3iNRsfCCe2eChxt8pUhe5mr7fl0T GLyW5GTFWBycFu5lHMxHX5RT+VTFts1tNNKTM= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <CAMFjj71_XL=q1vjLYr5JjULdu58YdT3ij-mXV_OTXG7jeeeZkQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAMFjj71Ooc3RdtiuERhsSt6LdaQVitn9RHxAGcQoMVYJ-G0c4w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Stefan, Output power is the same as before, approx 1100 Watts with a modified Decca. The difference is likely less than 3dB, one coax was RG-11, the other is RF-214/u silver plated dual shield. The RG-11 was up longer and finally broke, the RG-214/u was added latter.
The RG-214 has a noticeably lower resistance as one might expect. When running two loops in parallel my ERP was measured at 4W (actually within a range of 3.5-4.4W) I live in New England which is heavily wooded. I have experimented with verticals but the ground loss is high due rocky soil is very high.
If you have very lossy ground it is unlikely that you will see a benefit with a Litz wire loading coil as the ground losses >> than the coil loss. I also started a small fire with the vertical due to the high voltages - and this was when running only 250W out.
I have settled on loops as best for my location, but even then I had to put in considerable effort to make sure that the tuner could handle the high currents without over heating.
-- 73 Warren K2ORS WD2XGJ WD2XSH/23 WE2XEB/2 WE2XGR/1 2011/12/4 Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
73 Warren K2ORS WD2XGJ WD2XSH/23 WE2XEB/2 WE2XGR/1 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: xxSPAMxx Re: LF: XGJ in TF, jcraig |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: xxSPAMxx Re: LF: XGJ in TF, Warren Ziegler |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: XGJ in TF, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: XGJ in TF, Stefan Schäfer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |