To: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: DXl VLF experiments in 3HD |
From: | Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 3 Feb 2014 13:47:20 +0000 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=pass [email protected]; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=eQN1KFYNz35u3Ktmnb5hWSHH4MuI3FsCmrqiTZzVUlg=; b=YdvpwzQRLRa7nmoO7uZGrDlSo8hmPT/F9CXf0d5CZ4RUlMn/an8yV7egG5I6BiNFMH CbF0p5PYzOy1NPNMvgJf/TCQyOvvDsuIy17zjqnBanI4vQ1239K/BRVVIK436huWBcSV DaKwUMyQfOfkJfchwB3TiSG0vlXLPQG++dD6uJlEhvG6B+RFIZ/6afImkrCEQfsx7LaD MQyTUKcxPe4gr5vD1O0y80FNrJkXYgJwMjHrSbPEvN6GZZJNo8vABJYbNce9JP50bU5o vdPwHMVBYKWraKLjyhCjCHh5xoTRVoAQp/fUnnH5gdyxUzxEijc79wzWxN9pqHM8KzR5 cxNQ== |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <000f01cf1d9e$700b49e0$0802a8c0@acer> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Like many, I am more than a little concerned about the intentional use of 3rd harmonic reception of a VLF signal. Although I cannot really argue with Stefan's logic, somehow it jsut "feels" wrong. Very happy to hear of Stefan's 5kHz tests however. Good luck.On 1 February 2014 16:46, Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> wrote:
-- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: 8270.005Hz : 1/2/14 vs 2/2/14, uwe-jannsen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: 137.777 03-02, jcraig |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: DXl VLF experiments in 3HD, PA1SDB, Peter |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: DX VLF experiments in 3HD, Stefan Schäfer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |