Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test - post sunrise

from [Domenico IZ7SLZ] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test - post sunrise
From: Domenico IZ7SLZ <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 01:35:52 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=/plZvWHCL+trRM+YbcvoYtwUKOKBPoaXZUTY0W4wgn8=; b=F0NUqiXPvTKF3opHK05fTIY8xV8S8VBqSGhgHzhYOuoB0bxTLXo+Lm+N6nhNactaqy EoZnxQZNp1AvI4F2b74o8pE9swe1MjymAze8hCGNV0nlUEdqyNxD0IH9lV0SsHLQ5bOF zGB6tg3paO37mQiiUDyt83How8fgKtR7ZbrMjzM82rDuq+wz38VdHEIasiJ4MyISN48W RnWOQQ/prRY4Lh974G4V3aCIQUkXJpTVjlsRidWw8FOSvDoroEdG3skuEsaCGL/qTLu0 VwkxeUx3FMrJDIre1lidARk5GktUuqbetYg7jH1NoHkFOrcI/nJLca6C+MIG4L3Q0iDQ 2s3g==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
LF,
..another late report from me.

On 14 and 15 i ran my usual receiver setup on LF and using vlfrx-tools and 'sox' program i have prepared a bash file for attempt the decode of jt9-2, jt9-5 transmissions.

My routine is under development yet but i get already some results. See below .

I have decoded N1BUG on jt9-5 and 2E0ILY on jt9-2.

The audio frequency shown is wrong becouse it is not yet corrected by the speed-up factor.

As soon as possible i have to prepare a routine also for jt9-10 and check if some decodes of N1BUG are possible using the recordered audio of jan 15.


0022  17  -16  -0.5   3439.   0   CQ 2E0ILY IO82         JT9
0018  12  -17  -0.3   3439.   0   CQ 2E0ILY IO82         JT9
============== 2019-01-14 ===============



0210   2  -25  -1.0   2341.   0   VVV N1BUG 5            JT9
0130   1  -27  -1.0   2340.   0   VVV N1BUG 5            JT9
0030   2  -26  -1.0   2340.   0   VVV N1BUG 5            JT9
0010   2  -26  -1.0   2341.   1   VVV N1BUG 5            JT9
============== 2019-01-15 ===============



73, Domenico IZ7SLZ


On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 10:23, Geoff G0LUJ <[email protected]> wrote:
Extra reports, post sunrise.

The unchecking of the 'Discard audio frequency limits on RX' box has
enabled JT9-10 decodes to resume.

19-01-15 08:16 0816 -29 -0.6  396 2  VVV N1BUG 2

19-01-15 07:50 0750 -32 -0.8  395 5  VVV N1BUG 5
19-01-15 08:10 0810 -30 -0.8  395 5  VVV N1BUG 5
19-01-15 08:30 0830 -30 -0.7  395 5  VVV N1BUG 5

19-01-15 08:00 0800 -33 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
19-01-15 08:20 0820 -30 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
19-01-15 08:40 0840 -34 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: Re: EbNaut tonite, Domenico IZ7SLZ
Next by Date:  Re: LF: Re: EbNaut tonite, jrusgrove
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test - post sunrise, Geoff G0LUJ
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test - post sunrise, Chris Wilson
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]