To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: DL-SWL and WOLF |
From: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 4 Jan 2016 21:05:32 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=iLNk0HPPmkq+uSze7f/bu7f5oPrvldYoKMlZYksVeys=; b=TCv2FVn/ZooJFE3W8Ia0KHllMlWvSaLSEppIGYPggUSqLpFqP2XlMWrMhEQD5C0ZkR BooyLpdpk65ZTy56UnqWH99wrsb4vmVk8o9GqHuzcjrqdJ+y1FzrR6Die8eDlAxXyuwG wftYwqxbX4ezGVX1bAxdHOhtIo4HMVa0m+sRAxCT7q0Bh6+Ip0aRozgDRHhRV+e1HoNx pxoJmyzflLamtgxQunI83gGYPAwW32QD7TGeqKV6dPCBK40kRZH3486V184J3kv9vkfA ldGZspRD/NMT0ohrLeIqlaM0diVq+Mb8PecDWpgvNhHgdowWtO6aOo710uZE2k2luGFx fLbg== |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23TzujmNTV1d9oF7YHXqc3h02vr0Qvmpt6jPAWALWZcSMQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Yeeeess... It is a bit dated isn't it. Based on 11025 sampling rate, that'll give the old early WSJT soundcard calibration issues all over again. And only appears to give soundcard output. I do have an upconverter, but that needs I/Q drive and doubt the software generates that, so a phasing network needed. Direct digital drive to to be able to control my Gaussian ramped PSK source would have been better. Will take another look anyway - but I can see why its not used much here now... Andy On 4 January 2016 at 20:13, Laurence KL7 L <[email protected]> wrote:
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: LF: DL-SWL, Andy Talbot |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: 1 April already ? G4WGT RA1ADF 2200m OPERA 2118 km 19:57:02, Graham |
Previous by Thread: | RE: LF: DL-SWL and WOLF, Laurence KL7 L |
Next by Thread: | Re: Re: LF: DL-SWL and WOLF, Tobias DG3LV |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |