Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: 472kHz FT8 QSO?

from [Andy Talbot] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: LineOne <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: 472kHz FT8 QSO?
From: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 15:32:42 +0100
Cc: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AC3B7HX4XaMYl6vN6p5gCr3y2VqXcSdCybnxochOwxg=; b=uVF7sUrTbBxljGLAYAu6zpLIvN0qcMbC58iOja2M1CtChG5C8zGLCkVzfuIrnFX3SZ 71rZqwL96VXhA9pv1uczL09O6KanJ3T4coO13bej7t9NHgua3pkEWSkSQ8DBrkZ3DXmP pBV/3U+9sNUvNC9MThmp5s3FdvpwOYfIe26n92rJjG0csO4Xxg+flT1NX97MV0j30SUG korxci9V8G5VtGSHfqpS7WHyV/ZOIdBSwyyeVNv/bvMi34CwNyStbloy7nTxV+y4FIjk xyJdldMnW9qhpWaZzqTM29S4fckX0kPAfk1vM43IPnuNP600HSVTyyQEd+/SCAzTzcs/ 3oSw==
In-reply-to: <CAHAQVWMkJzKviRv6J_D463gTPaa72s+xZFCj_ct8eFSj8nourQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHAQVWMkJzKviRv6J_D463gTPaa72s+xZFCj_ct8eFSj8nourQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
You would do better with JT9.    It has a narrower signalling bandwidth
Don't jump on the FT8 bandwagon just because everyone else is using it at HF



On 11 September 2018 at 15:21, Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]> wrote:
After the success last night on 472kHz WSPR (10mW ERP) with the earth-electrode "antenna" in the ground, I may try 472kHz FT8 this evening. 

If you fancy a try please give me a call on FT8. I shall try 472kHz FT8 this evening probably after 1800z. I'll call CQ probably.

73s
Roger G3XBM
JO02dg (near Cambridge)

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  LF: 472kHz FT8 QSO?, Roger Lapthorn
Next by Date:  Re: LF: 472kHz FT8 QSO?, Roger Lapthorn
Previous by Thread:  LF: 472kHz FT8 QSO?, Roger Lapthorn
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: 472kHz FT8 QSO?, Roger Lapthorn
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]