Hello Stefan.
Some comments :
Here it keep in memory the last mode and band used when I start... I have
not your problem. I just chek all the menus, but I do not find anything about
that. So ???
Yes The WSPR-15 is not yet implemented, that is perhaps the reason why this
version it is not official...
The JT9 and JT65 are working very well
I Think also the docode is faster, the Deep option in the decode menu is
fine, it can decode 2 signals very close in frequencies and a bit better in S/N
reports (but I think no more sensitive).
I did not tried to open several instances of the V1.7.0 here. Often I open
one XSJT-X v 1.7.0 for WSPR2, one v 0.8 r3058 for WSPR15 and one for OPERA. That
all.
Best Luck and 73 Stefan.
@++ Andy.
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 11:41 PM
Subject: Re: LF: How is possible? / WSJT-X
Hello
Andy / F6CNI,
Thank you for pointing me to WSJT-X v1.7.0-devel, it
actually performs better than my old WSPR-X v0.9 r3058, especially when strong
and weak signals are present in the same time slot! It also shows a 2 dB better
SNR (sometimes) but i don't (still) know if it is 2 dB more sensitive. Also it
decodes faster.
I will use it from now on.
Unfortunately WSPR-15 is not
supported in that mode so i will use the older version for that.
Why does the
program not save the band? After a restart it always starts on 2m... But that's
a minor problem...
I will see if it runs for weeks without crashing, an
important parameter!
How is it possible to run 2 or multiple instances?
Do i need 2 installations?
73, Stefan
Am 09.09.2016 11:17,
schrieb DK7FC:
I think it has to
do with different software versions!?
| imestamp |
Call |
MHz |
SNR |
Drift |
Grid |
Pwr |
Reporter |
RGrid |
km |
az |
| 2016-09-03 09:04 |
F/DK7FC |
0.475681 |
+38 |
0 |
JN29od |
1 |
F6CNI |
JN19qb |
134 |
267 |
I'm still using WSPR-X v0.0
r3058 here. Newer versions performed worse for some reasons. This version does
not produce SNRs better than +15 dB if i remember correctly.
Another
thing may be that someone could use e.g. a 250 Hz wide filter instead of the
reference filter bandwidth of 2500 Hz (SSB), which then produces wrong
("improved") reports.
73, Stefan
Am 09.09.2016 10:13,
schrieb Max IK0VVE:
Could
someone explain this?
2016-09-08 19:42 IK0VVE
0.475682
+17 0 JN61km
0.05 F6CNI JN19qb 1119 322
2016-09-08
19:26 IK0VVE 0.475682 +1 0 JN61km
0.05 F6CNI JN19qb 1119 322
2016-09-08
19:10 IK0VVE 0.475682 -1 0 JN61km
0.05 F6CNI JN19qb 1119 322
2016-09-08
18:54 IK0VVE 0.475682 -6 0 JN61km
0.05 F6CNI JN19qb 1119 322
If I listen my
signal with my RX antenna 5 meters far from TX antenna my SNR is maximum +13
db, also for IZ0GIF that is about 4 km far from me.
Probably Andy has an
exceptional receiving system but +17 to more than 1000 km is a great SNR I
thing, HI.
After some minute great reports again:
| 2016-09-08 19:46 |
DH5RAE |
0.475755 |
+14 |
1 |
JN68qv |
0.5 |
F6CNI |
JN19qb |
730 |
275 |
| 2016-09-08 19:46 |
PA3ABK/2 |
0.475740 |
+19 |
0 |
JO21it |
0.5 |
F6CNI |
JN19qb |
320 |
198 |
73, Max IK0VVE
______________________________
...here some of my HAM Radio projects...
