Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

RE: LF: Would slower QRSS help?

from [Bob Raide] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: LF: Would slower QRSS help?
From: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 15:05:41 -0500
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>,<B05C8EC5C7854E948A857BF8EDB83C9D@White> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <91EDCA349BE942929730C480D5D64F7F@White>,<[email protected]> <[email protected]>,<F4CD79DB601A407180CBA5E23C92F14A@AGB> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Stefan-yes .010 [10 milihertz] of hertz-2949901 then back to 29.49900 next hour-etc-Bob
 
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 20:59:57 +0100
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Would slower QRSS help?

Hello Bob,

Just to avoid misunderstandings: I guess you mean 10 mHz, not 10 MHz? :-)

73, Stefan

Am 02.03.2014 20:47, schrieb Bob Raide:
G;
I plan to manually change freq 10 MHz top of hour for couple three hours is all-should be no trouble-Bob
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  RE: LF: Would slower QRSS help?, Bob Raide
Next by Date:  Re: LF: Would slower QRSS help?, Stefan Schäfer
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: Would slower QRSS help?, Stefan Schäfer
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: Would slower QRSS help?, Markus Vester
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]