I remember Jay and John Andrews ran those tests. As my memory serves me you are correct.
F6CNI did comment yesterday that 74.5-6 is best for UK/EURO. I will give it a try. I think I can use 137 WSPR15 as call sign will designate difference in bands. I will shoot Joe Taylor an e mail and get his comments.
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 16:08:09 +0200
From:
[email protected]To:
[email protected]Subject: LF: QRSS OP WSPR
Bob,
For QRSS reception on 4000m, better ask G4WGT or F5WK or F6CNI for a
preferred frequency. Ort maybe TF3HZ? He is reading the reflector as
well. At least i saw the flag from Iceland on the flagcounter of
SC8CS's new grabber which was announced here :-))
BTW, regarding OP65, Jay/W1VD recently did some tests comparing OP4 and
WSPR-2. The summary was something like "WSPR-2 is as "sensitive" as
OP8" !!. Correct me Jay. That means, instead transmitting OP65, you
could use WSPR-15 instead and may have 4 times higher probabbility to
get a decode, e.g. if there is just a short propagation window like on
137 kHz.
73, Stefan
Am 27.09.2013 15:55, schrieb Bob Raide:
Stefan;
It is same here. But you can't do everything-transmit and receive at
same time no go.
I have a similar PC got from neighbor last season a Samsung less than
two years old. Big difference from little ACER PC!
I think I am going to stick with QRSS 60 for anymore 73 kHz work. What
freq might be best for UK/Euro work? I understand that 72.4 is not
good in UK/Europe. Seems that 74.5-74.6 seems best from comments I am
getting?
Any suggestions appreciated-Bob
