Re: LF: Re: OT Waffle or Spam ? A different look at ZEVS

[Gary - G4WGT <g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>]

Hi Chris, Eddie & All,

I have also given this/these subjects some thought & I have been seriously tempted to make a similar statement as Chris has just posted.

As interesting they may be for the followers, this forum "LF" is not the place for these discussions.

There are dedicated forums for these topics with dedicated followers & that is where the postings should be made.

I subscribe to several other forums in the fields of VLF & sub 9kHz etc & I would suggest that others do the same so as to reduce "OT" off topic postings on the LF group forum.

73

Gary - G4WGT.

On 16 June 2011 12:18, Chris <c.ashby435@btinternet.com> wrote:

I don't think so, we're rather being force fed.
Not even sure it's legal to receive this signal under the terms of the various Wireless Telegraphy Acts, as it carries information and is not intended for general reception.
Mal and others have noticed a big drop off in 137/500kHz activity - this seems to me to have coincided with all this VLF stuff. Maybe we should rename the Reflector 'VLF' not 'LF' as it currently is!
Chris, G4AYT, Whitstable, Kent.
----- Original Message ----- From: "qrss" <qrss@talktalk.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 11:55 AM
Subject: LF: OT Waffle or Spam ? A different look at ZEVS

ZEVS I think is of interest to sufficient members of the group at the
moment.:-)

A slightly improved set up, this morning was the first time that my ZEVS
Plot has given a lock over the full transmission.

 All DATA traces search a set window until they 'lock' onto the signal.
I have highlighted the locked periods.

73 Eddie G3ZJO