To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: RE: Wierd WSPR spots |
From: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 16 Oct 2010 14:42:09 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vIvlXerw9JXvJuWxIp9wkU7kau6BYTooo2JA+pdQ76M=; b=OeavjEO2xe+ipy1ulP4KcDyrqeS3Fg4ydfWSfqTkaMfHd3Db+tuHZkWP1vaFedIA1z 0e5/jGl8vfv61rEUBCWxzvzzg6x7MUeJUbX+Ll24aNXM+Jzw+dmMcMmLn6bU+JniYg6Z hsNZzaKgsvrkhkR5FbGyubGvbEDMRQBybtPdk= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=py0EgftR+jUQxylB0zPvUVv8uUnq677/TEZf0SDXDHaXy45xpw/3KaYXlvEL0/Eh0e drsBliNMP8EYz+TYeJfcxzj6oBdrnfdbA4ID382Lckz4HZlfc6ayoDEBWv8Z+LCCiO2c QlFafF42cJ0mZyvtFyEiJqOP2f2KhGE1gNoX8= |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C886E0FF4D0@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be> |
References: | <[email protected]> <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C886E0FF4D0@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
You may be referring to this, I posted a few weeks ago.
IF, and this is a big IF, a chunk of interference has managed to get past the convolutional / Viterbi data decoder in the WSPR decoding routine and if this interference has sidebands, then there is a probability all its sidebands will wobble together. If this wobble is interpreted as valid FSK that passes the decoder test, then all will result in the same set of bits being decoded.
Now, the source encoding and removal of all input redundancy means than just about any random set of 72 bits that get generated will end up with a valid looking callsign, locator and a power level. And of course, all sidebands will give the same result if they've wobbled together. There are probably far more decodes of the interference that get rejected, its just those that the laws of probability say must happen occasionally, with their sidebands, that generate the multiple hits. So there's some broadband unstable interference with sidebands that manages to occasionally get through
and each sideband, as it wobbles in frequency with the others, decodes to a similar result.
On 16 October 2010 14:29, Rik Strobbe <[email protected]> wrote: John, |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: LF: 137 F4DTL, Rik Strobbe |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: Re: 137, Chris |
Previous by Thread: | LF: RE: Wierd WSPR spots, Rik Strobbe |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Wierd WSPR spots, Paul-Henrik |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |