Re: LF: Receivers

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: Receivers
From:	[email protected]
Date:	Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:46:16 EDT
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Hi Mike

AOL 7030

But as this was at the recommendation of Alan G3NYK he would be the best one to comment and his opinions would do for me as well.

All in all I think it's a hell of a Rx at any freq in its range!

Also FRG7700 but with mod to bypass attenuator and via a separate LPF into mixer stage - works but not measured for performance! The noise blanker is effective with some of my local impulse noise.

73 de

Pat g4gvw

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Re: RE: Re: VE7TIL heard in Southern Oregon..., (continued) LF: Re: RE: Re: VE7TIL heard in Southern Oregon..., Scott Tilley LF: RE: Re: RE: Re: VE7TIL heard in Southern Oregon..., WE0H LF: Re: Receivers, James Moritz Re: LF: Receivers, Nan and Sandy Sanders LF: Re: Receivers, McAlevey LF: Re: Re: Receivers, John Andrews Re: LF: Receivers, Ko Versteeg Re: LF: Receivers, Steve Dove LF: Re: Receivers, F6CWN Re: LF: Receivers, Ed Lesnichy Re: LF: Receivers, G4gvw <= LF: Receivers, Walter Blanchard LF: Receivers, J. Alan Lowe

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: TR: RE: 137 kHz activity, Hartmut Wolff
Next by Date:	LF: Re: Receivers, James Moritz
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: Receivers, Ed Lesnichy
Next by Thread:	LF: Receivers, Walter Blanchard
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]