Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: Can you look for us tonight with OPDS on 74.3213?

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Can you look for us tonight with OPDS on 74.3213?
From: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 11:57:45 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=pass [email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1391943471; bh=Zx7PonpEiSYG+erhgFEC0POWlZWYxGS3XzbNI09zpkg=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YKuplIBUTbesMBcqxiCd31EQu9J/9+uX22IfiWOaEDYZvaO0QiG3+LZU0VC4vrfmJ ekwzTxdhB0dvo0kWxWFlgWlh992OhygPXM650Jy30fzUnA2JQ62lzYKFLjnINoEbfu bQ0dIM7EhbbFHN2Y1RBo7FK+prvT58pQtARc9Q6c=
Importance: Normal
References: <[email protected]>,<B886E155009C4C749938C342F9E922B7@White> <[email protected]> <0AE8FCE0012A455E8854CB39126AA62B@White> <00b401cf250e$a4fc9420$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <F37CB823AAE742C9BE30E455B9260DFF@White> <[email protected]> <984B5BFDBD1644A6B4BC5F22996E9088@White>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Bob, Dex,
 
despite suboptimal SNR conditions, the opds-16 correlator produced 6 hits for WG4XRS: http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/opds.htm
 
In the morning, the carrier from Dex on 74323 became also clearly visible in the 0.95 mHz spectrogram. So I tried to rescan the recorded files with a lower detection threshold just to see how close it was (a sort of deep deep search ;-).
Using opds.ini parameters
 thresholddbcor=11.5  'minimum correlation peak height; default 15 dB,
 ns1=2  'less smoothing during carrier detection, more sensitive for stable signals; default 5 bins, 
and pruning out false detections on other frequencies, I ended up with 2 more spots for Bob and 3 for Dex:
 
opds16: date  time        call     distance     frequency   bandwidth  snr        correlation
 
2014-02-09 06:56:21 WG4XRS  6448km  74321.301Hz   5mHz -45.8dBOp 100% 14.3dB
2014-02-09 06:23:13 WG4XRS  6448km  74321.301Hz   4mHz -47.7dBOp  86% 15.9dB
2014-02-09 06:17:18 WG5XRS  7214km  74323.000Hz   4mHz -48.0dBOp  95% 12.0dB
2014-02-09 06:06:40 WG4XRS  6448km  74321.301Hz   4mHz -46.2dBOp  99% 17.2dB
2014-02-09 06:00:54 WG5XRS  7214km  74323.000Hz   3mHz -49.4dBOp 100% 11.9dB
2014-02-09 05:50:06 WG4XRS  6448km  74321.301Hz   5mHz -46.3dBOp  98% 14.8dB
2014-02-09 05:44:31 WG5XRS  7214km  74323.001Hz   3mHz -50.6dBOp  94% 11.9dB
2014-02-09 05:33:33 WG4XRS  6448km  74321.301Hz   4mHz -48.6dBOp  88% 15.1dB
2014-02-09 05:16:59 WG4XRS  6448km  74321.301Hz   5mHz -46.5dBOp  97% 15.1dB
2014-02-09 03:21:06 WG4XRS  6448km  74321.301Hz   4mHz -49.3dBOp 100% 14.3dB
2014-02-09 02:31:29 WG4XRS  6448km  74321.300Hz   3mHz -50.5dBOp 100% 12.6dB
In past sessions, there were still weak DCF77 artifacts exactly on whole Hz frequencies. Even though these were not obvious in the higher noise last night, Dex' carrier might still have been slightly impeded. This could be cured by a small offset eg. moving 0.1 Hz down.
 
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>