To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: DK7FC's VLF Active Antenna |
From: | Daniele Tincani <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 29 Dec 2010 15:40:55 -0800 (PST) |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1293666055; bh=MKP+794mIaGFwX5JmwSEwhphr6hL/r1BRQPPZcmPlA4=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=T8p2Ljp49qsWngMA63Gx4Dvpxrnr2nhWqSus/HccSkXGUzb0PhqHZW0g9ukzEjPG9IWwbmWZxQSKarF2/E23lhBGG/JPN2uxmyWoevgL/SNl345rO+lI9cJq6mUuN5gllI2Ztq4pMPgXGZYMu+zFTirw96hfdDbMMWjpe5TeGX0= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AzrWdoleKnbBgF7SX83opielaBnSWj6eAfcSW6Z7wo0U3KfLOLRVQT8il/LNVdJTHGUZfgYHS1NaKfgfHwt1M17M86cbx2sDmU7DkWuv52Amb4NZhCLtErMUBL9dyEURsyX8ZcDkDM5N1NNoWtO8id7JXDyUBab7qQO7MbdTXlQ=; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <F88E4E7623D944FB9658C8C02D8A1B18@lindavideo> |
References: | <F88E4E7623D944FB9658C8C02D8A1B18@lindavideo> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hello Ken, as far as I know, the 2SK170V could be a good candidate.
Best regards
Daniele
From: Ken <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wed, December 29, 2010 5:58:31 PM Subject: LF: DK7FC's VLF Active Antenna Stefan.
Could you please recommend an equivalent to to BF862 which is not Surface Mount for use in this circuit.
73s
Ken
M0KHW
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: "NM" on 136177.5, Piotr Mlynarski |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: DK7FC's VLF Active Antenna, Andy Talbot |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: DK7FC's VLF Active Antenna, Roelof Bakker |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: DK7FC's VLF Active Antenna, Chris Trask |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |