To: | hamilton mal <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Fw: TM0AST |
From: | Michel F5WK <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:57:33 +0200 |
Delivery-date: | Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:58:06 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <001401c575b2$662ed1a0$39e4fc3e@l8p8y6> |
Organization: | mTerrier |
References: | <001401c575b2$662ed1a0$39e4fc3e@l8p8y6> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Le lundi 20 juin 2005 à 18:08:34, [email protected] a écrit: ----- Original Message ----- From:hamilton mal To:[email protected] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 8:08 PMSubject: TM0AST Hi All The callsign that I read was TM0AST and not TM5AST. Which is correct ?? de G3KEV In the hurry, I forgot to check out the call sign in the QRS buffer. The good callsign is TM5AST. It's been corrected just after the beginning of the qso with Jim. Sorry about that. 73 de Michel f5wk -- The Bat 3.0.1.33 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: XES WOLF, chastant |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: TM0AST, hamilton mal |
Previous by Thread: | LF: TM5AST on LF, Michel F5WK |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Fw: TM0AST, hamilton mal |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |