Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: G4CFY writes off the 137kHz band

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: G4CFY writes off the 137kHz band
From: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 18:29:16 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAMFjj72EVAUx61a7rZeR41ufXx4z2A2h+UK+DYBj=EPqd0waxg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
And those who go a little more , Cams' comic so im reliably informed G,
But  , what  actually  is  he  talking  about in the  article  ?


--------------------------------------------------
From: "pat" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 6:20 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: "Warren Ziegler" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: G4CFY writes off the 137kHz band

Warren,
While many of us (particularly those of us of a certain age) have an affection stretching back to near childhood for that publication it is not for nothing that we nickname it "Practically Witless Monthly" :>)

73


On 08/09/13 02:53, Warren Ziegler wrote:

Tony Nailer G4CFY has a bit in his "Practical Wireless" column "Technical for the terrified" this month on the 137 kHz band in which he writes it off as worthless.

"With the limitation of antenna efficiency together with a bandwidth of only 100Hz, there really isn't much that can be done with this band."

 Anyone on the list know Tony?
Who is in the best position to write a rebuttal that PW will publish?


--
73 Warren K2ORS
                WD2XGJ
                WD2XSH/23
                WE2XEB/2
                WE2XGR/1



--
73 de pat g4gvw
es gd dx
qth nr Felixstowe
East Coast UK




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>