To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: VLF: 8270.1 Sunday 16:10 |
From: | Markus Vester <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 24 Jan 2016 13:59:16 -0500 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1453661956; bh=MMQ4wHBlsJFt64VRtitKdJTRjc1uBDRFoCQwqOsUAhc=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=8ZK3mUXVUjoZx2z98gqtHJW+F662DiXBOaJY3LhdlDCr7pvCkxRzBZHnyFGzNvJan NBQV8QTqPjLsFl6m2G35xj4416aPLeDEsAhFwJXtm4p3MExJCVLMlzIKC1PKHgPmG0 WYa9sl8kTslk8BlNIWA+0itdfA5JlKdbJBEfOteQ= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Thanks Paul for trying! This message was really targeted at Stefan's receiver in Heidelberg, who has started saving 70 uHz spectum data for possible Ebnaut decodes. But even there it would have been marginal. To make things worse, it started to rain here at 16:45; I had to go off air for about 10 minutes, and came back only with reduced.power. Running 0.27 amps (1 dB less) now, just below the onset of partial discharges.
I am now running another easier sequence:
Start time 18:30:02,
5 characters, 8K19A, 16 bit CRC, 10 second symbols,
total duration 5120 seconds,
end time 19:55:22
TX frequency is 8270.1 Hz to minimize the effect of the local test during EbNaut sequences, and 8270.0025 for carriers in between.
Well we'll see what we get...
73, Markus
Von: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: So, 24 Jan 2016 7:39 pm Betreff: Re: VLF: 8270.1 Sunday 16:10
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: WSPRnet problems, John Langridge |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: HGA22?, Laurence KL7 L |
Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: 8270.1 Sunday 16:10, Paul Nicholson |
Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: 8270.1 Sunday 16:10, 18:30, Markus Vester |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |