To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: DCF39 OFF again |
From: | Markus Vester <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 2 May 2012 17:58:52 -0400 (EDT) |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1335995933; bh=dxYiwVbKhnus1iCuljS5kReop6e2c5zOz+lFBE9A3lM=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qkKWr0w18sqEXAnjpwBCiT7F+ZHDgGNFV8jdD1q/QF2IHa8AGcml0UlIVx/eyjWsq cIV1UJepcOkxWbm0TUuXpErttaTBePyId4ycNTUwukH7TQ6cU0KhT17KAm6sXW4Xsr fA/4S5Pqc/MgCbKd44YriwnNmAl2gyS06JmAa7ro= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
They must have had some problems with the Burg transmitter running wild. Your screenshot shows a pair of unstable lines drifting down to 138.4 and 137.6 kHz. The very same lines appeared here, quite strong and noisy, with northerly colour: Best 73,
Markus
-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: Mi, 2 Mai 2012 9:18 pm Betreff: LF: DCF39 OFF again DCF39 was offline again this morning between 10 and 11 UTC. To the same time HGA22 had much more traffic. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/DCFHGA.jpg Maybe they plan to let HGA22 do the job of both? :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: DK7FC RST 549 to 569 on 137, Stefan Schäfer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: DK7FC RST 549 to 569 on 137, manginbenoit.pro |
Previous by Thread: | LF: DCF39 OFF again, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: DCF39 OFF again, Stefan Schäfer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |