To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Combatting Loran |
From: | [email protected] |
Date: | Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:58:03 -0400 |
Delivery-date: | Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:58:36 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <001001c58ab2$0cd7acc0$dd088751@w4o8m9> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
John,
if you would use a large loop laid out flat on the ground, the resulting polarisation would probably suppress most of the vertically polarized far-field interference. In addition, you could use a gradiometer pair, eg. 2 turns with 50 m diameter inside a single reversed turn with 70 m, acting as a series-connected active shield. The receive-"antenna" sensitivity would ultimately be limited only by the thermal noise of the ground conductance, coupled by eddy currents. Under these conditions, the optimum loop diameter is similar to the depth of the (magnetic dipole) source in the ground.
73 de Markus, DF6NM
-----Original Message----- From: John Rabson <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 20:19:29 +0100 Subject: Re: LF: Combatting Loran Jim, Do you think this approach would be worth trying at the surface station of a cave radio link? Regards, John G3PAI |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Combatting Loran, Stewart Nelson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: WD2XDW off, Laurence KL1X |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Combatting Loran, Stewart Nelson |
Next by Thread: | LF: Suitable ground?, J. B. Weazle McCreath |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |