To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Slower and slower |
From: | [email protected] |
Date: | Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:14:20 EST |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
In a message dated 2/19/01 12:12:29 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:
<< Using DFCW instead of QRSS will reduce the QSO time to abt. 1/3 and the required stability to 1/2 (0.02ppm). More sophisticated methods (FDK etc..) might even give better results. >> I wonder...was Andy's analysis confusing DFCW with FDK? |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Slower and slower, Rik Strobbe |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Trans-atlantic QSO/Active antenna preamps, James Moritz |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Slower and slower, WarmSpgs |
Next by Thread: | LF: Trans-atlantic QSO/Active antenna preamps, James Moritz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |