| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Slower and slower |
| From: | [email protected] |
| Date: | Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:14:20 EST |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | <[email protected]> |
In a message dated 2/19/01 12:12:29 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:
<< Using DFCW instead of QRSS will reduce the QSO time to abt. 1/3 and the required stability to 1/2 (0.02ppm). More sophisticated methods (FDK etc..) might even give better results. >> I wonder...was Andy's analysis confusing DFCW with FDK? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Slower and slower, Rik Strobbe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Trans-atlantic QSO/Active antenna preamps, James Moritz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Slower and slower, WarmSpgs |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Trans-atlantic QSO/Active antenna preamps, James Moritz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |