Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: bounce test

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: bounce test
From: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 12:40:49 +0000 (UTC)
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s2048; t=1479645649; bh=+ZF2+2l6B0wc0YJom/iuKweI3WeuDGuHEiqh4sUoyAo=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=WpWj3WzlJmI7UZlA4Z21QscY5yL08/BjsXrESp3noVf8j+/Urx/UBdj75BhaUWKsnpSOMfxuB4tCdGYItHpHcyDTcz+8GvPvmwD/4Li5reEeQyomTpNrEoFkyyvlkChIh5ixLbUz7l9fzI7L1z38HGBgENAV5GnItOymdcJerPaQSXa1zaryP/O8DFCTwf36VLmu1rulB2QsfLob4a2o0VMUqv5zhiQ77iyYcAnVm4apjWYJ8IGQ28Hg+1WAZM5e+Ohv+b/6q52Jg6NLoqpI6KHpgNFq1KboY8Xd5ZUXiM+CrsEtEAxKr5ToCXF7eY9lNBV6KeJsBOLlxMfeM4X5GQ==
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Tnx fer info but bounce backs are the norm now with black-sheep.... :-(

73 es GL Pete M0FMT GQRP#15097.in IO91UX 

On Sun, 20/11/16, Alan Melia <[email protected]> wrote:

 Subject: LF: bounce test
 To: [email protected]
 Date: Sunday, 20 November, 2016, 12:28
 
 Just to get an example of the
 bounce.io response.
 
 Please note these responses do not suggest your message has
 not been 
 accepted, they show that one members address, now obselete,
 cannot be 
 delivered to. They are only sent to the originator but are a
 pain. The owner 
 of bounce.io has been advised he does not have authority to
 intercept these 
 emails and has been requested to desist.....with no reply of
 course.
 
 Alan
 G3NYK
 
 
 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>