Hi Stefan,
thanks for the explanation.
73
Clemens
DL4RAJ
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected]
>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of DK7FC
>Sent: Friday, April 19, 2019 6:25 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: LF: IW4DXW with bad signal on MW in WSPR
>
>Hi Clemens,
>
>Yes, indeed. This is because i am running two identical
>receivers (using
>the same LO) with two orthogonal loops into my tree (/p) and then two
>WSPR instances using the same callsign (DK7FC/p). Sometimes
>WSPR uploads
>all two spots and sometimes just one of them (of course
>sometimes there
>is a decode at one antenna only). So this is not an anormality.
>
>73, Stefan
>
>
>Am 19.04.2019 17:16, schrieb Clemens Paul:
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>>
>>> A quick look to the database shows that the signal from Rik
>>> looks clean at any RX site, except at DL4RAJ.
>>> You know, the complainers ;-)
>>>
>> There was indeed another multiple decode,albeit on the same
>frequency.
>>
>> 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475797 -3
> 0 JN64bw 0.5 DK7FC/P JN49ik 563
>> 334
>> 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475797 +1
> 0 JN64bw 0.5 DK7FC/P JN49ik 563
>> 334
>>
>>
>> 73
>> Clemens
>> DL4RAJ
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of DK7FC
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 10:46 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: LF: IW4DXW with bad signal on MW in WSPR
>>>
>>> Hi Markus,
>>>
>>> A quick look to the database shows that the signal from Rik
>>> looks clean at any RX site, except at DL4RAJ.
>>> You know, the complainers ;-)
>>>
>>> 73, Stefan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 17.04.2019 22:29, schrieb Markus Vester:
>>>
>>> Hi Clemens,
>>>
>>> the signal from Ric looks perfectly clean at DL0AO,
>>> indeed a strong signal but no multiple decodes.
>>>
>>> 73, Markus
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
>>> Von: Clemens Paul<[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> An: rsgb_lf_group<[email protected]>
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> Cc: rsgb-lf-group<[email protected]>
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> Verschickt: Mi, 17. Apr. 2019 22:13
>>> Betreff: LF: IW4DXW with bad signal on MW in WSPR
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> IW4DXW is booming in here but unfortunately his signal has a
>>> very poor purity,hence the multiple deoces.
>>>
>>> 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475802 -7 0 JN64bw 0.5
>>> DL4RAJ JN68kj 389 8
>>> 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475787 -7 0 JN64bw 0.5
>>> DL4RAJ JN68kj 389 8
>>> 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475794 0 0 JN64bw 0.5
>>> DL4RAJ JN68kj 389 8
>>> 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475775 -19 0 JN64bw 0.5
>>> DL4RAJ JN68kj 389 8
>>> 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475791 -6 0 JN64bw 0.5
>>> DL4RAJ JN68kj 389 8
>>> 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475772 -20 0 JN64bw 0.5
>>> DL4RAJ JN68kj 389 8
>>> 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475760 -24 0 JN64bw 0.5
>>> DL4RAJ JN68kj 389 8 7
>>>
>>>
>>> 73
>>>
>>> Clemens
>>> DL4RAJ
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source
>>>
>> =link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>Virenfrei.>www.avg.com
>>
>>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source
>>>
>> =link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>---
>Diese E-Mail wurde von AVG auf Viren geprüft.
>http://www.avg.com
>
|
