To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: VLF in Spain |
From: | Daniele Tincani <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:54:01 -0700 (PDT) |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1308146041; bh=7wWeJCa7wbdH+Fw2EKZKx/IqCPxPvxQ4AXzqw1bnHTc=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=g0BClSLA3MggNZ+SStwJywPXYEbc3KwAtnIwsRi/23ZUDqi+sZu0xwRlVdj0RiX16GyOLfLvfLMKzF4DmWmakRB25m7SKdtdmLDMBKpf5IFmoPkxSp+uOeFokzCXDI6WFYQlaGd3Re1PqtCrjvHJl3LyUZtCHqoBn7xYyfp7qaY= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=i5cqf2LxJEbP8HnmWw8jcPCrXsl49sW2mzUAmy/kRcKeIbmmdDqpBgXkSHPhj6/gvWn99oyxDHzFtVM8fMywBpXFf6WXVWRHE2QZ0px0+EtPoEOT58Sem8Oomg7EN3GwcoApGFNXsMwk5T9xRq32zo3Vbx2svyG++NwWI2sufkM=; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <8024ACF0F5734035BFE8E7BBDDF47EA8@a8b21ba06852476> <002f01cc29f2$be0a1ce0$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g> <2F6C8B8017984C2A8563736DA67284AA@PC2> <[email protected]> <A4E373519F3B494BB5C315337C0F880F@PC2> <[email protected]> <11891ECF261E4CD8AFD5EDD8F68DF13F@a8b21ba06852476> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Stefan,
in fact I tried to compare a small and simple-to-build active loop for VLF reception (ref. http://www.vlf.it/easyloop/_easyloop.htm) with a short E-probe based on your design and with another short active whip based on Steve McGreevy's BBB-4. Unfortunately, noise conditions at my location (in Livorno, Italy) are so bad that it was very hard to get acceptable results under 10KHz. Additionally, I didn't perform specific tests with the E-probes, like for example attaching them to a fishing rod (or other support) to put them well outside of my balcony at 5th floor, that probably would have given a substantial improvement. Anyway, I think I have some test results and screenshots stored on my hard disk and I will be pleased to share them with Jose. I will be sending a more informative message (hopefully) on the reflector when back to home this evening.
Now I have a new soundcard (the popular E-MU 0202) and a new portable PC, so there could be room for repeating my tests in autumn.
Best regards
Daniele
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wed, June 15, 2011 2:19:56 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: VLF in Spain Hello José, OK, but if you live in a city, brobably it is better to try a small E field antenna first. Daniele Tinacani has done many tests with loops and E field antennas on 9 kHz. Maybe he can give some further advice (if he reads this mail). It would be worth to monitor a wideband screen to see which kind of noise affects the RX. Some EMC tricks may improve things easily by 20 dB, depending on the source and path of the noise. You can find these by testing, e.g. trying a battery instead of a normal power supply, trying a battery fed notebook instead of a normal PC, trying to ground (or not) the antenna either on the RX or antenna side, using an audio transformer to decouple an earth loop, rising the antenna by 2m (to reduce the gain and improve the wanted signal strength) and and and :-) I remember these works and email exchanges by 4X1RF, TF3HZ, G3ZJO and others. All they have gained a lot after seeing and experimenting where the noise comes from. So the wideband screen is essential i mean... 73, GL, Stefan/DK7FC Am 14.06.2011 23:28, schrieb josé manuel:
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: RE: LF RX loop, Rik Strobbe |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: VLF in Spain, Alberto di Bene |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: VLF in Spain, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: VLF in Spain, Alberto di Bene |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |