To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: NA VLF |
From: | "Alan Melia" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 18 Jun 2017 22:14:56 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1497820498; bh=XnA+mZjBTss/pCIpi6nOI6LLCaKIM4LYcikKWyxaK4k=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:X-Mailer; b=RRNdR/HCJ12D1YjymJxXNhGbEIjWzhX34G0XML6TzPpOmDvdHCdMl/fOSzh1iLl10e0CK0+0SOUXcI/hk9PQqKenfWvXWtg7JOPurOG6iV7io/0zuRsFxZ3Oy4d/RFPiXumbeNJqk2Pv/1boOggAgViQ4IN1nb2Ut26EA/F/aYE= |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
iHi Paul and Joe. Interesting results on VLF . The following may be
interesting? I dont know how badly electron precipitation affects VLF though
it aligns with the poor results on the 16/17th. The precipitation was low in
the 15th, but no signal seen. (but it doesnt mean conditions were good
.....just not very bad !)
Best Wishes Alan G3NYK----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Nicholson" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2017 9:41 PM Subject: Re: LF: NA VLF Joe wrote: > I'll keep tranmsission going. Daytime 15th: No signal detected; Overnight 15th/16th: Good signal, average 0.12 fT, S/N poor; Daytime 16th: Down in the noise at about 0.05 fT; Overnight 16th/17th: No signal visible, E-field down for some hours; Daytime 17th: 0.075 fT, S/N 12 dB in 23uHz, 8270.007080 +/- 0.5 uHz Overnight 17th/18th: 0.13 fT, S/N 12.7 dB in 46.3 uHz, 8270.007085 +/- 0.5 uHz -- Paul Nicholson -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: LF: JT9 on LF, tonite!, Dave |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: June 17-18 Best QRB/reports, DK7FC |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: NA VLF, Paul Nicholson |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: NA VLF, jcraig |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |