To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: DCF39 ERP and field strength |
From: | Dick Rollema <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 16 May 2006 12:44:56 +0200 |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <004701c67873$67748720$2201a8c0@PC2> |
References: | <003c01c67744$f08f9160$2201a8c0@PC2> <[email protected]> <004701c67873$67748720$2201a8c0@PC2> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hello José, I found the following results for DCF39, using the CCIR curves: Sea Water, average salinity, conductivity 5 S/m, dielectric constant 70, EMRP = 40 kW. Wet Ground, conductivity 10 mS, dielectric constant 30, EMRP = 40 kW Land, conductivity 3 mS, dielectric constant 22, EMRP = 108 kW. Medium dry ground, conductivity 1 mS, dielectric constant 15, EMRP = 1364 kW. 1 kW EMRP produces 300 mV/m at 1 km distance. At 500 km over perfect (flat) ground 1 kW EMRP would produce 300/500 = 0.6 mV/m. I measure 2078 µV/m. Over perfect ground this would correspond to (2078/600) squared x 1 kW = 12 kW EMRP. So even over almost perfect conducting sea water there is 10log (40/12) = 5.2 dB extra path loss. I think this must be refraction loss due to the curvature of the earth. 73, Dick, PA0SE At 01:00 16-5-06, you wrote: Hello Dick: |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: DATONG VLF converter, Johannes Wilke |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: DATONG VLF converter, Alan Melia |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: DCF39 ERP and field strength, Jose Manuel |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: DCF39 ERP and field strength, MarkusVester |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |