To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: RE: Soil Conductivity Measurement |
From: | Dick Rollema <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 01 Aug 2005 14:50:04 +0200 |
Delivery-date: | Mon, 01 Aug 2005 13:50:31 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <005301c59688$9fa05250$6405a8c0@MJUSonyLaptop> |
References: | <003301c5967e$422fc600$0600a8c0@router> <005301c59688$9fa05250$6405a8c0@MJUSonyLaptop> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
To All from PA0SE Mike, G3LHZ, wrote: Has anyone on the list experience in measuring ground conductivity at such frequencies? I do it by first resonating the aerial system at 137kHz. Then I measure the total resistance of the aerial-earth system by connecting a measuring bridge between the bottom end of the coil and earth. The bridge can be a simple one because it only has to measure a pure resistance. Loss resistance of the coil can be found from its inductance and Q. Subtracting this from the total resistance yields the earth resistance. Radiation resistance and loss resistance of the aerial itself are negligible contributions to the total. It is indeed important to measure the resistance at the actual working frequency as it is frequency dependent. See ON7YD's website http://www.qsl.net/on7yd/136khz.htm. In my station the only earth electrode is the gas mains. Earth resistance varies with season and humidity of the ground but usually is of the order of 22 ohms or so. But we live in a polder almost with our feet in the water. 73, Dick, PA0SE |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Suitable ground?, J. B. Weazle McCreath |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Suitable ground?, Johan Bodin |
Previous by Thread: | LF: RE: Soil Conductivity Measurement, Mike Underhill |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: RE: Soil Conductivity Measurement, Uwe Wensauer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |