Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: VLF: Ground loop improvements and test carrier... |
| From: | DK7FC <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Wed, 03 Apr 2019 20:10:52 +0200 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1554315053; bh=OZW7iQ/HPaVOboYtWkwDYVznMwc1v58tRxH5/tPPm1Y=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=g2gXKv6i5JOYvTNwUbZs8MqBgyBryetETj219RrbWrkhEuaX8CuAcRWni7RIBYQS2 lNhfqVtaNVz5xieBop6+CQpc96WWiM40q9NzR0zLTKhjl2u/MvtCApEHBlHPz67nAC MiKFhVeJeay0R2Ibd3ejgNnnjk6HKQ0Iqvb+xGmxepOQM1HZXEkYl6nSm0etxN3fMh YdWhuPdBOJhA1972Y+9wKpAi6nynT4D/Fg/sAorYIMcLGR7ZBQ7TMu2Z9iOEFdP6j6 XNd5bt/XMsP/UchZ1dk6xR28zAaWOqW1TKwi82dbU+gAho8wefkv/JnbrloyAocGIt Ylg48sVNvbslg== |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hello Paul,Thank you. Interesting. For you the difference is 2.8 dB. But the loop points almost fully into your direction. The angle turned from 6 deg to 3 deg, ie. a theoretical gain of G = 20 lg(cos3/cos6) = 0.04 dB. But i see, 1.3/1.07 < 1130/900, but not much! And maybe the QRN increased during that time. Yes, a constant return depth of the current was assumed. So, for your direction i would assume something like G = 20 lg(1130/900) = 1.98 dB. So the 2.8 dB is a good value! The propagation path should have changed mch during that short time. Amplitudes: 900m: E-field: 5.329e-07 H-field: 2.081e-06 1130m: E-field: 8.853e-07 H-field: 2.995e-06 ...calculated using vtwspec. +66% in the E field and +44% in the H-field. 73, Stefan Am 03.04.2019 18:00, schrieb Paul Nicholson: Stefan wrote: > A carrier transmission was done at 8270.1 Hz, using an antenna > current of 2 A on both antennas. Received here - 900m Ant: T2019-03-31_13:58,+10m: 1.07fT S/N -10.4dB/1Hz 1130m Ant: T2019-03-31_14:12,+10m: 1.30fT S/N -7.6dB/1Hz The signal strength hasn't increased as much as the area has increased. So maybe the ground return current has remained at the same depth. Then the signal would increase as by 1130/900 which is close to what I see here. Can you compare amplitude and not S/N? -- Paul Nicholson -- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: Ground loop improvements and test carrier..., Paul Nicholson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: VLF: Ground loop improvements and test carrier..., DK7FC |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: Ground loop improvements and test carrier..., Paul Nicholson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: Ground loop improvements and test carrier..., DK7FC |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |