Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Ebnaut receiver frequency stability qustion

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Ebnaut receiver frequency stability qustion
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 13:53:06 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1545223989; bh=f9eg+Qeu4TFbqyqjtRwPTyX5AAWU6YDnEtQj+cq1pcI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=SJeGR0e9a6xC8fiA4Ci98Pst1aLyTxJ3Fhz8DQLPaRU91MvUcLz+AEqP+6vV6mCMJ hSCJvAT2zXqEBfRbq+UzMde9kt3wpum2u8MsTGAnHq//JDMNjiK2EZ6p6+VGYwLGoa t6/xIbdvelob2jkaL9X1YWN3Gqr/2DRlwEI4nnrjHaCEiO5oan65LK7DKMOauX7A6A pL+Gpq2OyAmnBx8YxurqZfNm7+KxAGJlMRrqkpL44eC+q9qJxkfOrQQrOLbW49/eVn ONC4oWNbutbXiXtq8FtZDLYZKFFs2cbGKu5qt9VWeGCMOKgbVLKAhhNw/pZgkJQOdw 2iBf+eOEV/Jaw==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hi Paul,

Am 19.12.2018 13:00, schrieb N1BUG:
Hi Stefan, Luis, LF,

Yes, yes! Please grab some paper and start drawing those circuit
diagrams! ;-)
No problem. I've drawn the circuit years ago. But the design (based on a G4JNT design) is a bit more complex. But there you don't need image rejection filters, which is an advantage. Image in the attachment. This is what i use for LF transmissions. The xtal is GPS locked by another circuit that is not shown in this schematic. But instead one can use the NEO GPS modules. Not only EbNaut, the converter is good for WSPR, QRSS, DFCW, OP32, JT9 and so on.

What kind of mixer?
For the RX i'm using an SBL-3 DBM. But a SA612AN will work too ( i use that one for the MF converter). There, you will need narrow band filters.

Can filters help? Band pass filter on antenna input to mixer? LPF on
LO to mixer?
Yes, a band filter in front of the mixer and then an image rejection filter on the AF side. Thus it is better to use an LO frequency of 125 or 120 kHz rather than 135 kHz because filtering will be easier then.
Probably more questions but since I am not an engineer and have
never seen a diagram of this, I don't know what else to ask.

Can the same LO and mixer be used for a tx up-converter?
I'm using the same LO for the RX and then TX converter.

73, Stefan

Attachment: TX IQ converter.png
Description: PNG image

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>