Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Octo-soundcard for the Raspi, another question |
| From: | DK7FC <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sat, 08 Jul 2017 12:58:08 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hi Paul, Meanwhile i did more tests:Used two audio isolation transformers to DC-separate the inputs: No difference. Am 07.07.2017 20:02, schrieb Paul Nicholson: Can you send or put on the web a short .vt file of ch1 and ch2, (after vttime, vtresample) long enough to contain at least one or two good glitches? http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/VLF/record.tarA fresh 2 channel file, with a tone at 1 kHz on both channels. I also added the log files. (some day i will have my own Raspi-based webserver, but there are still to many open projects already). It looks like the effect is even more expressed at 1 kHz relative to 500 Hz. In the attachment you can see how it looks in SpecLab.First the attachment size was 294 kB. The mail didn't arrive on the reflector. Now it is resized to 238 kB. Let's see if it comes through now :-) 73, Stefan
|
| Previous by Date: | LF: EbNaut beacon now, DK7FC |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Octo-soundcard for the Raspi, another question, DK7FC |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Octo-soundcard for the Raspi, another question, Paul Nicholson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Octo-soundcard for the Raspi, another question, DK7FC |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
